If I am not misguided, you declared your religious views
as, 'naturalism.' If I am off beam,
please, forgive me and, please, correct me.
And, if not a naturist, this might help you understand what a
'naturalist' believes. Anyway it is, then people,
enjoy the ride along with me. I ask this
of you with the desire to get to know more about you since we are family. I don't know a whole lot about much of the
younger family members as I have lived in Mexico for most of the last thirty
years.
As I see it, in my studies, I see this, naturist opinion
as the belief that the only thing that exists in the Universe is physical,
material matter, which denies the existence of anything spiritual. No angels, no knowable life-force and
certainly, no type of gods. Is that
right? It is believed then, as I
understand it, by 'naturalists,' that humans have no soul, no inner-self. Thereby meaning, that all living beings are
just a bunch of lifeless neurons, certain chemical compounds, and a huge cosmic
mishap and the like. Of course, then,
under this category of credence, there could also be no Living, Purposeful Creator;
as naturists just follow evolution as the creative force in the entire
Universe. Which, if I am not wrong,
means that such human experiences like pain, pleasure, appreciation of beauty,
art and music and a reality of one's own being, could not really be authentic. These, and other, 'mystical-type' things, just
become some form of physiological reaction, bringing one to find no reason to
wonder about, really, anything.
Please, if I am wrong, let me know. Being as I see it, the values of naturalism
leads to several shortened ways of assessment about the world. One of the most important concerns is the
philosophy of telos, or purpose. Does
a kitchen knife have purpose? Or, does
the user of the knife have purpose? What
give us purpose or where does it come from, if it exists? Naturism promotes the idea that humans are not
used by higher powers for assorted and enigmatic reasons. Therefore, lacking such agents or AGENT or
direction or Director, we must decide our own purposes. As you probably already know,
the Christian view embraces the knowledge that the purpose of all things was
given to them by a Higher Authority. (Just
like Hebrew National All-Beef Franks)
Since naturalism explains that there is no higher authority, no deity, divine
or holy being, it therewith assume that Humankind, all of creation, and every
individual thing in it has no aim or real objective in life. (Which, to me, seems very dark, gloomy
and totally depressing. Nevertheless, a
few out there do hold fast to this philosophy.)
Uncaused-evolution is what the majority of naturalists
believe, though, not all. Nevertheless,
both sides support the idea of everything having no real purpose. Yet, they can never really put in plain words how
they actually arrived at that murky theory.
Naturalists, and most atheists, believe that the theory of evolution
explains how all life on Earth began without the work of a supernatural element
being involved. Yet, most evolutionists
try to place at least a small sense of purpose to our otherwise dead existence
while many naturists don’t even bother to do that. As an alternative to Mankind having an
existential, sacred purpose, evolution proposes that it is only our genes which
have a function and that this function is to simply propagate and
multiply. However, as I see it, this
is not a genuine purpose. If it was,
then why worry about fidelity in marriage, getting married, having families and
things of that nature? The survival and
spreading of our genes would be more important than any of these other,
emotional and feeling-oriented types of restrictions. Away with them all! The rationale of this in material form is, the
survival-of-the-fittest. Which, of
course, then become the number one element and teaching of evolution. Everybody must get pregnant and have lots of
babies. The strongest of these will
survive. The others? Who cares?
Naturalism, as I understand it, asserts that there is no
soul, no intellect, and no identity, and I think it also teaches that there is
no preference or choice. Like the
hurricane that is caused by the flutter of a butterfly's wings. Every whim we have, every accomplishment we make,
every word we say is determined by the dealings that came beforehand. If we are controlled by our genes' drive to breed,
then we are incapable of choosing any of our ideas, our view of the world, or
our favorite color or flavor of candy.
This defeatist attitude becomes a hindrance in the sphere of moral
principles. If our actions are not
controlled by our brains or souls, one must ask the questions, are lawbreakers answerable
for their wrongdoing? This line of
thinking also reveals the two-facedness of evolutionists who spew wrath on Creationists;
if previous measures establish our beliefs, how can Christians be blamed for
believing in God?
It is pretty
much spot on that our actions and beliefs are, for the most part, influenced by
events we have been exposed to. That's
why our God encourages us to contemplate on His Word, Deuteronomy 11:18, “Fix these words of mine in your hearts and minds; tie them as symbols
on your hands and bind them on your foreheads.” Colossians 3:2 “Set your minds on things above, not
on earthly things.” The Bible also
teaches that we have a distinct soul and spirit, Hebrews 4:12, “For
the word of God is alive and active. Sharper
than any double-edged sword, it penetrates even to dividing soul and spirit,
joints and marrow; it judges the thoughts and attitudes of the heart,” And, that Mankind has a specific purpose, Genesis 1:26-31,“Then God said, “Let us make manin
our image, after our likeness. And let them have dominion over the fish of the
sea and over the birds of the heavens and over the livestock and over all the
earth and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth. So God created man in his own image, in the
image of God he created him; male and female he created them. And God blessed them. And God said to them, “Be fruitful and
multiply and fill the earth and subdue it, and have dominion over the fish of
the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over every living thing that
moves on the earth.” And God said,
“Behold, I have given you every plant yielding seed that is on the face of all
the earth, and every tree with seed in its fruit. You shall have them for food. And
to every beast of the earth and to every bird of the heavens and to everything
that creeps on the earth, everything that has the breath of life, I have given
every green plant for food.” And it was
so. And God saw everything that he had
made, and behold, it was very good. And
there was evening and there was morning, the sixth day.”
In the end, someone once wrote to me in a letter, ‘naturalism
is just another fancy way to deny the existence of God.’
So, if I made some grievous error along the way, please,
take the time to let me know. Thank you.